<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Possibility and Probability &#187; Web Services</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ironboundsoftware.com/blog/category/programming/web-services/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ironboundsoftware.com/blog</link>
	<description>Droplets of Yes and No</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 01:37:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>		<item>
		<title>Web 2.0 is a bad name</title>
		<link>http://ironboundsoftware.com/blog/2005/11/09/web-20-is-a-bad-name/</link>
		<comments>http://ironboundsoftware.com/blog/2005/11/09/web-20-is-a-bad-name/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 03:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Loadholtes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SOA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Services]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ironboundsoftware.com/blog/?p=164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s been a lot of press lately about Web 2.0. All of the hype aside, I think that is a terrible name. In my mind, the web can&#8217;t be versioned and by putting a number on it you cause people to set certain expectations. For me the web is fluid environment that adapts itself constantly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s been a lot of press lately about <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/web2.0">Web 2.0</a>. All of the hype aside, I think that is a terrible name. In my mind, the web can&#8217;t be versioned and by putting a number on it you cause people to set certain expectations.</p>
<p>For me the web is fluid environment that adapts itself constantly to what is going on. To a person &#8220;browsing&#8221; the web, it shouldn&#8217;t matter if your website is built on rails, or if it using .NET or J2EE. Paul Graham has talked about this in several of his essays. The main idea of having your business on the web is that you can change your back end as often as you need to without impacting your customers.</p>
<p>Right now people expect certain things to happen when they &#8220;upgrade&#8221; a piece of software. They expect new features, better UI&#8217;s, etc. etc., and whatever else the PR machines tell us will be great about the new release. A lot of people will get the PR worm stuck in their ear whispering to them &#8220;Wait for the next version&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>When that happens people stop moving forward. Look at Internet Explorer. So many people are afraid to move to FireFox or other browsers because they believe that version 7 is just around the corner and it will bring a newer, brighter, sunnier day. But that isn&#8217;t guaranteed.</p>
<p>The promise of the web is you don&#8217;t need to sit around waiting for the upgrade to be released, instead the upgrade finds you. Suddenly the website you shop at is faster. A bug that used to effect your recommendations is fixed and now you are getting better suggestions.</p>
<p>A system like that can allow something really interesting to happen. Instead of hyping up whatever awesome groundbreaking feature a company has in development (and is scheduled for release any day now), a company can talk about their roll out last week and how it has made life better/easier/simpler/faster for its customers.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s what Web 2.0 is all about, the delivering the results now, not talking about what you are going to do. If you need examples of companies that live this every day, check out <a href="http://amazon.com">Amazon</a> (<a href="http://mturk.com">Mechanical Turk</a>, <a href="http://a9.com">A9</a>, etc.) and <a href="http://google.com">Google</a> (<a href="http://mail.google.com">gmail</a>, <a href="http://earth.google.com/">Google Earth</a>, etc.). Rarely do you see press releases from them talking about what they are going to do, its usually press releases about what they have done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ironboundsoftware.com/blog/2005/11/09/web-20-is-a-bad-name/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amazon, the Mechanical Turk, and the future</title>
		<link>http://ironboundsoftware.com/blog/2005/11/08/amazon-the-mechanical-turk-and-the-future/</link>
		<comments>http://ironboundsoftware.com/blog/2005/11/08/amazon-the-mechanical-turk-and-the-future/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2005 02:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Loadholtes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Services]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ironboundsoftware.com/blog/?p=163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I used to think that Amazon was just another dot-com company. Then after seeing them survive the burst, I thought they were lucky. No a days I think they are pretty visionary. I&#8217;ve ranted about A9 before, I use their associates program, hell, I even use their Tip Jar system. Suffice it to say I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to think that <a href="http://amazon.com">Amazon</a> was just another dot-com company. Then after seeing them survive the burst, I thought they were lucky. No a days I think they are pretty visionary.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve ranted about <a href="http://a9.com">A9</a> <a href="http://ironboundsoftware.com/blog/2005/09/29/a9com-my-favorite-search-engine/">before</a>, I use their <a href="http://katieandnickreviews.blogspot.com">associates</a> program, hell, I even use their <a href="http://ironboundsoftware.com/products.html">Tip Jar</a> system. Suffice it to say I think Amazon is pretty cool. Now they have introduced this <a href="http://www.mturk.com/mturk/welcome">Mechanical Turk website</a>.</p>
<p>My first thought was that the idea was interesting, but why call it artificial intelligence? There&#8217;s nothing artificial about it. Maybe from all of the data that get  some PhD candidate to build a corpus of an expert system of some type, but that seems a way off. What&#8217;s the big deal with that?</p>
<p>Well, that question was answered for me today after reading <a href="http://au.sys-con.com/read/150251.htm">this article</a>. The author points out that with a system like mturk, Amazon has harnessed its existing user base in a way that can generate a ton of business for them. This puts them light years ahead of their competition. And the way that Amazon pays attention to it web services, it shows that they want developers to get into this technology because it is going to be here to stay.</p>
<p>I think that if Microsoft spends all of its time worrying about Google they are going to get blindsided by Amazon. Amazon is leveraging the web in a way I never thought would be possible. They haven&#8217;t just built a brand, they&#8217;ve built an army.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ironboundsoftware.com/blog/2005/11/08/amazon-the-mechanical-turk-and-the-future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

